The Ferrari Factor

One of the recurring pieces of advice in Financial Independence literature is the idea of curtailing discretionary spending, or reducing ‘unnecessary’ outlay. An oft provided example of such spending is purchasing coffee, or other hot beverage types if they’re your bag. There’s even a catchy phrase to describe it: ‘The Latte Factor’. Coined by David Bach, the idea is simple: a little spent often will rack up over time, compounding to an overall high amount. The viewpoint is not without its critics and comparisons can be drawn to the controversial ‘smashed avocado’ outburst of Australian millionaire Tim Gurner. 

In a Forbes article on the topic, the author explains that “The Latte Factor applies…to whether we own one car or two” and that if we shunned our “third car”, we wouldn’t miss it at all. This excessive spending on cars is what we call ‘the Ferrari Factor’.

The Cost of Cars

Cars are ubiquitous in today’s society and they can represent a large proportion of an individual’s outgoings. Depending on which source you choose, the average cost of running a car is in the range of £160 to £390/month. One article estimated the cost of buying a car and running it for a year was £1,575/month! Here at MedFI, our vehicular expenditure comes out at £170/month/person. These may not seem like staggeringly large amounts, though when you compare it to the average £671/month cost of a mortgage, it puts things nicely in perspective.

One factor influencing the amount spent on cars is the rise of car finance, including schemes such as Personal Contract Purchase (PCP*) agreements. The vast majority (8090%) of new cars are bought on finance and an increasing number of used cars are too, with 50% of used cars bought on finance in 2018. The period September 2018-2019 saw 2.4 million new and used cars purchased using such plans. The amount of credit issued by auto finance dealers more than doubled between 2011 and 2016. £37.7bn (yes, billion) of advances were issued for private car purchases in 2018-19, representing a 3% increase compared to the previous year. In all, the total growth in new and used car finance was over 200% and 175% respectively between 2008 and 2018.

Worrisome Figures

One of the concerns with the ready availability of such finance is that it encourages, or at least facilitates, people buying cars they could otherwise not afford. For example, higher-end manufacturers such as Audi are some of the most popular purchases on such plans. This is obviously part of their attraction too. As it has been eloquently stated, the “Mondeo man of 10 to 15 years ago is now….[a] BMW, Mercedes or Audi man”.

There has been a deleterious impact on personal finance as a consequence of this. Areas with higher car ownership have, perhaps unsurprisingly, demonstrated the biggest increases in personal debt. One article suggests that buying with finance cost 68% more than buying outright overall. This extra expense has seen people having to reduce their spending elsewhere, work extra hours or even voluntarily terminate their (unaffordable) agreements. Indeed both arrears and default rates are on the rise, particularly for those with high credit risk (i.e. lower credit scores). 

Furthermore, an alarmingly low proportion of those financing car purchases seem to actually understand the agreements they’re making. Indeed nearly half of those surveyed didn’t know how much they’d borrowed. The blame does not lie solely with consumers, however, and concerns over mis-selling of car finance have prompted the FCA to investigate. Their report comments on multiple issues, which include a lack of understandable information and a commission model that creates an incentive for brokers to act against customers’ interests. 

The FCA estimate that changes would save customers £165 million/year and these are due in 2019/20. Their worrying conclusion was that “the way commission arrangements are operating in motor finance may be leading to consumer harm on a potentially significant scale”. Parallels to the infamous sub-prime mortgage collapse have been made and peer-to-peer lending platform Ratesetter has withdrawn itself from these types of loans. It’s not apparent that the bubble has burst quite yet, though there remains concern that it might soon pop. 

The Ferrari Factor

Car ownership, depending on your viewpoint, could fall anywhere on a spectrum from necessity through convenience to luxury. Unlike the ‘little and often’ of the latte, flat white or even orange-mocha-frappuccino, car finance can represent a ‘large and often’ expense. Based on the statistics above, an increasing number of people are taking on high monthly outgoings for their car with a consequent hit to their finances.

We appreciate that for some there’s more to owning a car than getting from A to B. For some it’s a serious hobby or passion and, as always, a drive towards FI(RE) must strike the right balance in quality of life. Similarly, other modes of transport are not necessarily cheaper, as reliable or efficient, greener or more practical. As an example, Mr MedFI’s commute via train would take 30 mins longer each day and the annualised cost would be nearly £1500 more (minus the added depreciation cost on the car). 

The article is not designed to scaremonger; car finance can be beneficial if managed properly. As ever, we hope to encourage readers to think about their own financial journey and, in this case, the role cars and transport play in that. Perhaps next time you come to buy a car, if at all, keep the Ferrari Factor in mind. 

*Authors side-note: the initialism PCP carries notorious connotations, such as the potent hallucinogenic drug phencyclidine (“angel dust”) and the old term for a severe pneumonia of the immunocompromised, Pneumocystis carinii.

5 thoughts on “The Ferrari Factor

  1. Currently I am taking public transport to work as an experiment.
    I leave home at 05:05 and cycle to town and get the bus at 05:20 and arrive in work at 06:40 and get the train back around 16:30 arriving home about 18:00.
    Total travel time is about 3h10m vs. driving 2h30m (but at the timing of my choosing).
    Cost of bus/train = £20/day
    Cost of petrol = £16/day (133 miles at around 52 mpg)

    Having driven and taken public transport I would like to say that it’s not just a question of cost.
    I feel better after taking public transport and although it does take longer, it does give me a bit of exercise both ways and I’m less stressed.

    Regarding cars:
    I didn’t have a car for the first 5 years of my professional career and I reckon that by doing so I saved maybe £20,000 – £30,000 which has probably grown to £30,000 – £50,000.


    1. Thanks for your comment! I agree experimenting is both public transport and car is a good idea. It looks as if your commute ‘costs’ you an extra £4 and 40mins/day, but as you correctly point out the feel-good factor and exercise from cycling is difficult to quantify so it may end up being a preferable option.


  2. Also those car dealers will want to provide you with a new car about every three years. I assume that these PCP deals are for three years. We have a car bought new fifteen years ago for cash that is still running after 98,000 miles. Over that time we have spent about £237 per month. I haven’t worked out how much we might have saved.


    1. Thanks for your comment. You’re right, I’d imagine there’s lots of up-sell when the PCP’s (which are usually 2-4 years) come to an end. The interest rates is another thing we don’t go into in the article, but anything other than 0% interest on the agreement is akin to taking out a high-interest loan to buy a car.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: